[Voyage-linux] Re: Own Linux kernel (2.6.29) for ALIX2 with supportPCA9555 and many other.

[Andrey Kaplun]

This kernel I compiled by necessity to exclusively have a support PCA953x in 
ALIX2. After the useless attempts to find the finished solution. Included 
modules into the kernel ARE ONLY THOSE, which for me were necessary. For 
this I attachment of config file. Moreover I wrote " If anybody of 
interesting… of " - if you not interesting, then do not loaded this kernel 
:)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alexander Krsek" <merlin at gremlin.cz>
To: <voyage-linux at voyage.hk>
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:25 AM
Subject: [Voyage-linux] Re: Own Linux kernel (2.6.29) for ALIX2 with 
supportPCA9555 and many other.


> Andrey Kaplun <vectra at ...> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> I compiled own Linux kernel (2.6.29) for ALIX2 with support
>> PCA9555 and many other. If anybody interesting - this url:
>> http://www.atsys.ru/linux-2.6.29/config-2.6.29
>> http://www.atsys.ru/linux-2.6.29/modules.tar
>> http://www.atsys.ru/linux-2.6.29/bzImage-2.6.29
>>
>> http://www.atsys.ru/linux-2.6.29/System.map-2.6.29
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Voyage-linux mailing list
>> Voyage-linux at ...
>> http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux
>>
>
> Linux 2.6.29 specifically for Alix2 without CONFIG_MGEODE_LX and
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CS5536 ?? I do not see the point. And what is the reason 
> for
> virtual terminal, framebuffer or inputs (kb/mouse) ?
>
> On the other hand I miss patches for netdev LED trigger and aufs support. 
> Or
> some patch to actualy USE hw aes encryption device (ocf?).
>
> So my question is: What is the bonus of using this kernel? For me it seems 
> like
> vanilla linus kernel, maybe with some non-default options enabled, but 
> without
> any real optimalization for Alix2.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Voyage-linux mailing list
> Voyage-linux at list.voyage.hk
> http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux