[Voyage-linux] Re: UDEV Rules, hardware Mac addresses

[John Schultz]

What is the status on this issue?


On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 02:59, Gustin Johnson <gustin at meganerd.ca> wrote:

> I noticed the same behavior.  Moving or cloning the CF and putting it
> into a different SBC yields incremented interface names (eg eth1
> instead of eth0).  I could find no mention on the CF card in any file
> on the file system.
>
> This does not seem to happen with the previous release which has the
> expected rules in the expected places (/etc/udev/rules.d and
> /lib/udev/rules.d).  It was trivial to "reset" an image by removing
> the lines containing the previous MAC address.
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Kim-man 'Punky' TSE
> <punkytse at punknix.com> wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On 8/30/2011 3:04 PM, John Schultz wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly does that have to do with the hardware addresses of the
> >> physical adapters?
> >
> > If you have rebuilt the initrd and the initrd contains some rules that
> > persist the MAC addresses and interface names, then probably explained
> your
> > problem.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 00:59, Kim-man 'Punky' TSE <
> punkytse at punknix.com
> >> <mailto:punkytse at punknix.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>    Hi John,
> >>
> >>    Then, what udev rules store inside the initrd?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Kim-man "Punky" Tse
> >
> > * Open Source Embedded Solutions and Systems
> >  - Voyage Linux (http://linux.voyage.hk)
> >  - Voyage ONE   (http://linux.voyage.hk/voyage-one)
> >  - Voyage MPD   (http://linux.voyage.hk/voyage-mpd)
> > * Voyage Store   (http://store.voyage.hk)
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.voyage.hk/pipermail/voyage-linux/attachments/20110830/54e713f0/attachment.html>