<div>Just an option: If you have one of the boards with extra ram that makes the /dev/shm partition, you could save the files there and have as fast of writing capabilities as the RAM. Hope this helps with your testing.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>-Jeff<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/21/06, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:voyage-linux-request@list.voyage.hk">voyage-linux-request@list.voyage.hk</a></b> <<a href="mailto:voyage-linux-request@list.voyage.hk">
voyage-linux-request@list.voyage.hk</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Send Voyage-linux mailing list submissions to<br> <a href="mailto:voyage-linux@list.voyage.hk">voyage-linux@list.voyage.hk
</a><br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> <a href="http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux">http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux</a><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
<br> <a href="mailto:voyage-linux-request@list.voyage.hk">voyage-linux-request@list.voyage.hk</a><br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> <a href="mailto:voyage-linux-owner@list.voyage.hk">voyage-linux-owner@list.voyage.hk
</a><br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of Voyage-linux digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Re: [Madwifi-devel] Real throughput tests at
4.4km p2p link<br> (Beat Meier)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:49:25 +0200 (MEST)<br>From: "Beat Meier" <
<a href="mailto:Beat.Meier@gmx.ch">Beat.Meier@gmx.ch</a>><br>Subject: [Voyage-linux] Re: [Madwifi-devel] Real throughput tests at<br> 4.4km p2p link<br>To: Punky <<a href="mailto:punkytse@gmail.com">punkytse@gmail.com
</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:voyage-linux@voyage.hk">voyage-linux@voyage.hk</a>, <a href="mailto:madwifi-users@lists.sourceforge.net">madwifi-users@lists.sourceforge.net</a>,<br> <a href="mailto:madwifi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net">
madwifi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:14353.1145634565@www076.gmx.net">14353.1145634565@www076.gmx.net</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>unky wrote:
<br><br>>Hi Beat,<br>><br>>Did you use vmstat or others in your test to see if the WRAP boxes are<br>>CPU bound (i.e. 0% CPU idle)? I have experience that runing iperf<br>>client and server would consume all your CPU power. So in my
<br>>performance test, I don't run iperf on the measured boxed anymore.<br>>Instead, I use wget to remote download a big file from another local<br>>server.<br>><br>><br>I have about 50% cpu load<br>I have also done the test with connected pc with iperf and scp but with a
<br>ftp, scp, wget<br>the limiting factor is the disk (even worse a cf)! I know the new disk are<br>fast but<br>do a test with an old disk ...<br>For bandwidth test you should really use iperf or something similar.<br>BTW: No difference in tests on wrap or with connected pc
<br><br>Greetings<br><br>Beat<br><br>--<br>Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!<br>"Feel free" mit GMX DSL! <a href="http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl">http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl</a><br><br><br><br>------------------------------
<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Voyage-linux mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Voyage-linux@list.voyage.hk">Voyage-linux@list.voyage.hk</a><br><a href="http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux">
http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux</a><br><br><br>End of Voyage-linux Digest, Vol 16, Issue 21<br>********************************************<br></blockquote></div><br>