<div class="gmail_quote"><div>Solomon,<br><br>I have not used the SR9, but I have had good luck with the XR9 cards. They appear to be very static sensitive so take the proper precautions when handling the cards.<br><br>Stock Voyage 5.1 and madwifi worked well.<br>
<br>Also be aware that the SR9 cards will not communicate with the XR9s.<br><br>We have since switched to XR5s. Our application is clear LOS and antenna gain at 5ghz is much easier to achieve than at 900mhz (and gain beats power every time).<br>
<br>Dean<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:23:33 -0700 (PDT)<br>
From: Solomon Asare <<a href="mailto:solomonasare@yahoo.com">solomonasare@yahoo.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Voyage-linux] Re: Ubiquiti Super Range 9 SR9 900MHz<br>
miniPCI on Voyage<br>
To: <a href="mailto:voyage-linux@voyage.hk">voyage-linux@voyage.hk</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:513956.49385.qm@web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com">513956.49385.qm@web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi Rodney,<br>
thanks for sharing your experience. The cards are quite expensive so I want to know what the experiences of others are before I get a few to test.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
solomon.<br>
<br>
<br>
--- On Sun, 14/6/09, <a href="mailto:rodney@optimail.com.au">rodney@optimail.com.au</a> <<a href="mailto:rodney@optimail.com.au">rodney@optimail.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:rodney@optimail.com.au">rodney@optimail.com.au</a> <<a href="mailto:rodney@optimail.com.au">rodney@optimail.com.au</a>><br>
> Subject: [Voyage-linux] Re: Ubiquiti Super Range 9 SR9 900MHz miniPCI on Voyage<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:voyage-linux@voyage.hk">voyage-linux@voyage.hk</a><br>
> Date: Sunday, 14 June, 2009, 12:49 PM<br>
> Hi Solomon,<br>
><br>
> I had no stability problem with the madwifi+SR9 or SR2.<br>
><br>
> Didn't measure power output directly, but received signal<br>
> strength over<br>
> distances of 200-500 metres. The SR9 performed well, using<br>
> 802.11b, 5MHz<br>
> bandwidth. Don't know how to select 10Mhz bandwidth.<br>
><br>
> Data rate was set to 1MHz, to maximise operating distance<br>
> rather than data<br>
> throughput.<br>
><br>
> PS: At the time of using SR9 & SR2, I was using a<br>
> hand-made debian,<br>
> similar to voyage, with madwifi. Now using voyage 0.6 with<br>
> ath5k driver,<br>
> and CM9 (64mW) instead of SR2/SR9 (400mW). Hardware is VIA<br>
> mini-ITX.<br>
><br>
> Rodney<br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > Hi,<br>
> > thanks for your response. What I want to know is:<br>
> > Did it perform as advertised?<br>
> > Did you get the advertised power output / data rate?<br>
> > Were you able to set the narrower bandwidths of 5MHz /<br>
> 10MHz?<br>
> > Was the driver stable?<br>
><br>
> Rgds,<br>
> solomon.<br>
> >><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Voyage-linux mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Voyage-linux@list.voyage.hk">Voyage-linux@list.voyage.hk</a><br>
> <a href="http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux" target="_blank">http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Voyage-linux mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Voyage-linux@list.voyage.hk">Voyage-linux@list.voyage.hk</a><br>
<a href="http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux" target="_blank">http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of Voyage-linux Digest, Vol 54, Issue 13<br>
********************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br>